For decades, the American financial model followed a familiar structure. Earn a wage, save consistently, invest long term, and rely on gradual growth to build security. That model still exists, but it is no longer the only framework people are willing to rely on. A combination of economic pressure, shifting job markets, and increased access […]

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has been in the news a lot lately.

The TSA is part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and today it is responsible for securing the nation’s transportation systems. This most visible part of this is screening passengers and baggage at airports. Democrats in Congress, upset about how a different part of DHS, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), is conducting itself, have refused to provide funding for DHS.

The result is that, starting Feb. 14, TSA agents were required to work while not being paid. Facing economic hardship or just frustration, many of them chose to take other jobs or take advantage of accrued sick and vacation leave rather than work without being paid. This situation left TSA checkpoints understaffed, with the predictable result of hours-long waits at some airports. This inconvenienced millions of Americans who are just trying to fly from one place to another as efficiently as possible.

The irony is that ICE—the target of the Democrats’ ire—was not affected by the DHS funding lapse; ICE and Border Patrol were fully funded by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that was passed last summer. But Democrats in Congress needed to show their anti-ICE voters that they were trying to do something, and they chose to make American travelers and TSA staff suffer in pursuit of their ideological ends. And while President Donald Trump took action to pay TSA employees, that is legally questionable, and it has done nothing to make the Democrats less intransigent.

It does not have to be this way.

In the wake of the September 11, 2001, terror attacks, Congress attempted to mitigate the continued targeting of the airline system by creating a federal agency that could counter that threat, as opposed to the disparate private entities that had been providing airport security up until that point. Most people do not realize that the law does not require government employees to perform security functions at airports.

Even in creating the TSA, the law allowed for the Screening Partnership Program (SPP) which allows airports to use private companies to conduct screening services. Subject to federal oversight, any private companies undertaking this work must comply with TSA requirements, including screening procedures. What they do not do is use TSA employees, which means that their operations are unaffected by any fights in Congress over funding the TSA. Currently, 20 airports participate in the program, including two that see substantial traffic: Orlando and San Francisco. In fact, San Francisco’s airport has only been using private contractors for security screening for over two decades.

The question isn’t why 20 airports participate in this program. It is why every airport doesn’t participate in this program.

While the legislators who created the TSA were no doubt doing what they thought was best in the face of real concerns about waves of terrorist attacks, for reasons both theoretical and practical the creation of the TSA may have been a mistake. It was a mistake as a theoretical matter because the creation of the TSA (at least with regard to air travel) was just the government assuming a task that the private sector had been doing.

There is nothing inherently governmental about conducting security screenings before getting on an airplane such that it needs to be done by government employees, and the existence of the SPP shows that the government agrees. The government has no special competency in security screening, and Congress should try to avoid taking over functions that can be adequately handled by the private sector. It is vital to national security to keep America fed, but it would be a disaster if we sought to federalize all of America’s farmers in response to that realization. The same is true for airport security.

The government should avoid assuming that which can be done by the private sector. This has been made clear in the case of the TSA. The creation of the TSA eventually brought a large unionized workforce, which increases costs to the government and makes operations more rigid and less nimble. In a time of massive technological advancement, innovation at security checkpoints has been less than lackluster. Imagine what could be if the TSA focused on intelligence and counter-terrorism while allowing the private sector to focus on efficiency and customer experience.

Moreover, as we are experiencing right now, the current TSA paradigm turns efficient, convenient air travel into a political football. Government shutdowns make metaphorical hostages of airline passengers by making trips to the airport more time-consuming and less convenient. Why do we stand for such a thing? Transitioning all airports to the SPP would allow Americans to keep living their lives while politicians in Washington fight over government funding.

Americans know that the private sector generally does things better than the government. Despite efforts to the contrary, that’s why we do not have government-run grocery stores, car manufacturers, or film studios. And we should not have government-run airport security.

Airports would be wise to switch their security operations to SPP rather than allow their operations and the flying experience to be subject to the whims of Congress.

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal.

The post Privatize the TSA appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Back in the halcyon days of 2019, when former President Joe Biden was still just a former vice president only suspected of senility as opposed to a confirmed senescent, Scranton […]

The post Minneapolis Madness: Dems Move to Bring Back One of the Grossest Gay Stereotypes in History appeared first on The Western Journal.

President Donald Trump called out The New York Times and CNN for reporting a "fake" and "made-up" 10-point plan allegedly involved in peace talks with Iran.

ExxonMobil on Wednesday warned its first-quarter earnings could take a hit of up to $6.5 billion tied to the war in Iran, though the company said most of the impact stems from accounting timing related to hedging contracts and is expected to reverse in future quarters.

Leaders of several Canadian indigenous organizations gathered in Ottawa on Wednesday to voice their concern at the sunsetting of federal funding for some organizations.

The post Watch: Canadian Lawmaker Despairs at Fate of ‘MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+’ People appeared first on Breitbart.

Florida prosecutors plan to file a subpoena for Tiger Woods' prescription drug records from a pharmacy following the golfer's March 27 arrest on suspicion of driving under the influence.

By 'ending weaponization,' the media mean Trump's DOJ should do nothing about years of Democrat lawfare, until Democrats can return to do it again.

A new Pew Research study dismantles a phony line of attack used by media activists to smear the Supreme Court's conservative majority.

Should we use a scalpel to turn boys into girls? That's not a value judgment or a debate, because it's just a clinical decision to be made by trained experts.

Critics call the Iran strikes a betrayal, but Trump's own books show he has said for 25 years that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons.

Eliminating the 1.5 million fraudulent people who enrolled in 2025 means that coverage numbers may have actually increased.

When people are rooted in their communities, they are happier -- and they develop the habits of self-government.

The American Mind’s ‘Editorial Roundtable’ podcast is a weekly conversation with Ryan Williams, Spencer Klavan, and Mike Sabo devoted to uncovering the ideas and principles that drive American political life. Stream here or download from your favorite podcast host.

Genocide or Hyperbole? | The Roundtable Ep. 312

Over Easter weekend, as the Iran War approached its sixth week, Trump reissued his ultimatum to Iran: open the Strait of Hormuz or face complete destruction. This week, the guys take some guesses at what Trump intends for our adversary, and what is to come long-term. Meanwhile, amid the conflict, heroes have emerged—most recently in the harrowing rescue of an American airman downed behind enemy lines. Plus: updates on the amazing, ongoing success of the Artemis II mission to the moon. NASA is back in the game.

The post The American Mind Podcast: The Roundtable Episode 312 appeared first on The American Mind.

Horns blared and protesters screamed "Stop ICE!" outside a meeting on the western edge of Maryland where county officials were discussing mundane issues like the solid waste budget.

The ceasefire with Iran is proving to be quite fragile.

Lawyers for Sean "Diddy" Combs are expected to tell an appeals court on Thursday the judge who oversaw the hip-hop mogul's sex crimes trial should not have considered evidence that he abused and threatened former girlfriends...