An Alternative News Aggregator

News of the Day

“Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace to those on whom his favor rests.”

 - Luke 2:14

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

NRA-ILA - 0 sec ago
In September, the North Carolina General Assembly briefly returned from recess and re-referred Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to the House Rules Committee.

Hegseth Planning Huge Shakeup Of Top Military Command: REPORT

The Daily Caller - 1 hour 4 min ago
'Working to achieve the same goal'

O'Reilly & Vittert on the Global Intifada

Bill O'Reilly - 1 hour 12 min ago
Bill joins Leland Vittert on NewsNation to discuss antisemitism, Islam, and recent attacks.
Bill O'Reilly 2025-12-16T17:18:00Z

Miss Rachel Apologizes For Poorly Timed 'J Is For Jihad' Episode

The Babylon Bee - 1 hour 16 min ago

NEW YORK CITY, NY — Popular kids' entertainment mogul Miss Rachel apologized this week for releasing what many are calling a poorly timed video titled "J Is For Jihad."

Food Stamp Recipient Complains She Can’t Buy Junk Food With Your Tax Dollars

The Daily Caller - 1 hour 30 min ago
'What is the point of food stamps if it’s just for ‘real food?’'

Chick-fil-A Doubles Down, Keeps DEI on the Menu

The Daily Signal - 1 hour 34 min ago

It’s one thing to catch a local Chick-fil-A rebelling against Christian values—and quite another for headquarters to defend it.

After this month’s revelation that an Orem, Utah location was publicly supporting same-sex marriage in a congratulatory post on Facebook, several disappointed customers reached out to corporate, hoping for an apology—or at least clarity—on what they saw as a public departure from the chain’s longtime beliefs.

What they got instead was further confirmation that the Cathys’ beloved empire has lost its way.

According to an LGBT magazine in Salt Lake City, people who’ve complained about the post have gotten the following response.

Obviously, we’d expect a company rooted (at least formerly) in biblical values to serve everyone. That’s scriptural. But there’s a difference between selling a chicken sandwich to someone and celebrating their behavior. 

Regardless, it’s absolutely baffling in America’s current pushback climate that any company—let alone a self-proclaimed Christian one—would openly admit to “embedding Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)” in “everything we do.”

Obviously, this isn’t a business caught unaware by a single rogue operator. This is a business with a deep and pervasive problem of activism.

As Megan Basham asked, “what’s going on here??” What indeed.

While skeptics are tempted to pin all of this on the Orem managers, that argument falls apart under the weight of the company’s other policies. If the local operators can’t declare, “I want to be open on Sundays,” how can they say, “I’ll message on something antithetical to Chick-fil-A’s beliefs”? Either the mission statement exists “To glorify God by being a faithful steward of all that is entrusted to us” or it doesn’t.

Either way, the entire controversy is astounding. On what planet would consumers expect Chick-fil-A to be to the left of places like AT&T, Toyota, McDonald’s, Walmart, Amazon, and dozens more?

It boggles the mind, the Political Forum’s Steve Soukup agreed. But he was quick to point out, “It’s important to remember that Chick-fil-A is a privately held company. Consumer pressure can do a great deal to change corporate misbehavior, but often, shareholder pressure is even more potent, and I think this is one such case,” he observed. 

“For years, social conservatives were buoyed in the culture wars by the ability of companies like Hobby Lobby to resist left-wing political trends and fads because of their private ownership. Chick-fil-A’s insensitivity to the current of cultural rebalancing represents the mirror image of that resistance,” Soukup lamented.

“Robby Starbuck was wise to target left-leaning corporations with right-leaning customer bases because that gave his efforts immediate impact. Nevertheless, in Robby’s undertakings, the threat of shareholder frustration always implicitly backed up the threat of unhappy customers. That’s not the case with Chick-fil-A,” he said, “which appears to have decided, at least for the time being, to remain on the wrong side of the cultural-counter-revolution.”

Of course, in this instance, some would argue that Christians are the shareholders, and a company that’s held itself out to represent them is beholden to that same community.

It’s why believers have been so disappointed by the moral failings that have plagued the brand since 2019. It’s also why they have the power to demand, with the same grassroots enthusiasm that forced the hands of Target and Anheuser-Busch, faithfulness to the standard Chick-fil-A has set for itself

In the meantime, there’s plenty of puzzling about why the shift happened at all.

Maybe, the Free Enterprise’s Stefan Padfield speculated to The Washington Stand, Truett’s grandson Andrew (now CEO) and his team “are true believers, in the sense that they wholeheartedly agree with things like discrimination in the name of anti-discrimination and men becoming women simply by saying so.” Or, he suggested, “the relevant decision-makers might be radical activists themselves or under the spell of some. … These types don’t really care if they destroy the business so long as they can pat themselves on the back for being ‘on the right side of history.’” 

They could also be living under a rock, Padfield supposed, not realizing how “toxic DEI has become.” Or “they could be misguided opportunists who think marketing themselves as pro-DEI will somehow lead to greater returns. Regardless,” he said, “Chick-fil-A is free to embrace DEI—and we are free to eat elsewhere.”

Family Research Council’s David Closson is equally stunned by the chain’s departure from the Cathys’ legacy, but he had plenty to say about what the executive team is getting wrong.

“When Chick-fil-A says it ‘embraces everyone,’ that’s faithful to Scripture,” he notes. “But to embrace contested identities—such as transgender identities or identities rooted in same-sex behavior—as morally legitimate expressions is something altogether different. A company grounded in Christian conviction should be able to love and serve every person without endorsing categories that contradict biblical truth,” Closson insists. 

That’s why the statement about “‘embracing all people regardless of … sexual orientation or gender identity’ and its commitment to embedding DEI into ‘everything we do’ raises legitimate concern,” he stressed.

“Diversity, equity, and inclusion frameworks in corporate America are not neutral. They typically operate from a moral vision that conflicts with the Christian understanding of creation, sin, identity and human purpose,” Closson continued. “DEI, as commonly practiced, does not merely require treating all people kindly. It demands the affirmation of identity categories and behaviors Scripture calls believers to lovingly but firmly reject.”

As he underscored, “Christians can and should affirm kindness, hospitality, and equal treatment for all customers and employees. But love for neighbor never requires affirming what God calls sinful or endorsing identities that obscure rather than reflect His created design. A mission committed to glorifying God must be anchored in truth as well as compassion,” Closson urged.

“When corporate statements blur that distinction, they drift from a biblical foundation toward a secular ethic that cannot sustain the Christian identity Chick-fil-A has sought to cultivate over the years.” 

This is a company, Closson pointed out, that “sought to distinguish itself from other national brands by appealing to its founder’s Christian convictions. Unfortunately,” Closson added, “recent developments suggest that this commitment increasingly functions as marketing rather than sincere conviction.”

As a former manager of a North Carolina Chick-fil-A told TWS, “Many think that they hold to great values. I beg to differ. They uphold great standards of customer service—but that does not equate to values.” 

That doesn’t mean the company can’t change. Look at the transformation we’ve seen from U.S. businesses that no one dreamed would shift to neutrality.

Instead of clinging to obsolete DEI when the rest of corporate America has walked away, how about leaning into the faith-based identity that most loyalists already take for granted?

Stop trafficking in this false idea of Christianity that offends. Move the vice president of diversity, equity and inclusion to a charitable project, ask for moral compliance from every operator representing the brand, and most of all, stop being afraid of who you are and the convictions you were built to represent. 

That, not wokeism, is how you honor Truett’s legacy. That, not compromise, is how you live out Chick-fil-A’s purpose.

Originally published by The Washington Stand

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal.

The post Chick-fil-A Doubles Down, Keeps DEI on the Menu appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Hegseth Orders Review Of Discharge Characterizations For Troops Booted Over Biden’s Covid Shot Mandate

The Federalist - 1 hour 40 min ago
Pete Hegseth speaking.Secretary of War Pete Hegseth signed a memorandum ordering a reevaluation of discharge characterizations for service members removed from service for foregoing the Biden-era Covid shot mandate, the Pentagon revealed Tuesday. Signed on Dec. 6, the new directive instructs the War Department to undertake a “proactive review of personnel records, to identify individuals who were […]

Foiled Left-Wing Terrorist Attack Must Be The Beginning, Not End, Of Trump’s Antifa Crackdown

The Federalist - 1 hour 52 min ago
Antifa at the White HouseThe time for swift, strategic, and sweeping steps to end organized left-wing violence is now or it might be never.

Brown University Shooter Still at Large – Open Discussion Thread

Conservative Treehouse - 1 hour 54 min ago

Everything about the Brown University shooting doesn’t make sense through the ordinary prism. However, if political ramifications in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s targeted assassination are overlaid against the Brown University murders, then a certain context might reconcile some of the issues. {GO DEEP}  Was Ella Cook targeted in a similarly motivated fashion to the […]

The post Brown University Shooter Still at Large – Open Discussion Thread appeared first on The Last Refuge.

Pages

Rune Hammer Feeds

Subscribe to Rune Hammer aggregator