The Department of Education may soon be closing shop, but that doesn’t mean the Trump administration’s attempt to course-correct higher education in America is finished.

Given that it is over a year since the American people elected President Donald Trump, it’s a good time to review how his administration has done on one of its most important tasks: cure elite institutions, higher education particularly, of the diversity, equity, and inclusion madness.

Given how central these programs have become to elite universities, it’s no surprise they haven’t abandoned them without a fight.

There is still a huge amount of work to be done.

But several departments in the Trump administration have been relentless in trying to remove this destructive and illegal doctrine from our schools. Here are some of the most important steps Trump has taken so far.

Executive Order on DEI

The perhaps biggest blow to DEI in higher education came at nearly the moment Trump entered office when he signed a flurry of executive orders, including “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity.” It essentially repealed President Joe Biden’s Day One executive order that transformed the federal government into the primary enforcer of the “Great Awokening.”

“Illegal DEI and DEIA policies not only violate the text and spirit of our longstanding Federal civil-rights laws, they also undermine our national unity, as they deny, discredit, and undermine the traditional American values of hard work, excellence, and individual achievement in favor of an unlawful, corrosive, and pernicious identity-based spoils system,” the order read.

Mike Gonzalez at The Heritage Foundation called this and other similar orders the “policy equivalent of the Romans salting the Carthaginian fields after reducing their Mediterranean city-state enemy to ruins: Promoting racial preferences was after all the hallmark of the defeated and dispatched Biden administration.”

The Trump executive order drastically changed how federal departments would do business, but most importantly in terms of higher education, it opened up the possibly to review the vast array of grants handed out to higher education that promoted DEI.

DOGE and the Department of Education

It was through the executive orders on DEI that the Department of Government Efficiency began to review grants being distributed to colleges and universities with an eye toward removing those that promoted the now-illegal DEI.

This included $373 million at the Department of Education that had been funding 70 DEI training grants for teachers.

One grant, according to the New York Post, was reportedly funding teachers to “engage in ongoing learning and self-reflection to confront their own biases and racism, and develop asset-based anti-racist mindsets.”

While it’s certainly a huge and positive development that the Department of Education is shutting down, those keeping the light on inside have done an excellent job of continuing this work of removing bogus DEI grants.

In February they canceled “18 grants totaling $226 million that were awarded under the Comprehensive Centers Program.”

Among the things being funded by these grants was a “video instructing teachers to ‘flick that white man off your shoulder’ in order to resist the ‘settler patriarchy’ and the ‘white gaze.’”

Instead of just running on autopilot, the Department of Education actively went about cutting off the arms of their own DEI octopus.

Civil Rights Lawsuits

Another way of going after DEI in higher education came from civil rights law. Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination “on the basis of race, color, or national origin.”

It was through this that the Department of Education and Department of Justice threatened colleges and universities with lawsuits and withholding of funds if they did not stop programs that discriminated based on race.

For instance, the Department of Education Office of Civil Rights sent a so-called Dear Colleague letter to Harvard University, informing the school that the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard disallowing race-based affirmative action programs would be enforced.

The letter indicated that programs that “may appear neutral on their face” but in fact facilitate racial discrimination would be subject to scrutiny.

The Trump administration has used Title VI as a means to freeze hundreds of millions of dollars in funds to universities it says are in violation of the law.

The State Department has recently jumped about this effort to remove DEI from higher education too. According to a report in The Guardian, the State Department released a memo on Nov. 17 seeking to exclude 38 universities from the Diplomacy Lab federal research program because they “openly engage in DEI hiring practices.”

Civil Rights Lawsuits, Title IX Edition

The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, led by Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, has aggressively applied Title IX of the Civil Rights Act to root out another major component of the DEI revolution. The Department of Education has also been launching investigations of Title IX violations.

DOJ has investigated schools from K-12 to university level for allowing men to infiltrate women’s sports and women’s spaces.

“Title IX exists to protect women and girls in education. It is perverse to allow males to compete against girls, invade their private spaces, and take their trophies,” Dhillon said in May. “This Division will aggressively defend women’s hard-fought rights to equal educational opportunities.”

The University of Pennsylvania made a deal with the Trump administration to keep federal funding by saying that it would no longer allow men to compete in women’s sports. UPenn had previously allowed Lia Thomas, a man, to compete in women’s swimming.

The school was also required to issue an apology to past female swimmers.

The post Here Are 4 Ways Trump Has Successfully Pressured Higher Ed to Abandon DEI appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Save 25% on American-made Ivermectin products from The Wellness Company in a special Black Friday Sale for Breitbart readers.

The post Black Friday Sale on Made-in-USA Wonder Drug! appeared first on Breitbart.

A fleet of planes that UPS grounded after a deadly crash isn’t expected to be back in service during the peak holiday season due to inspections and possible repairs, the […]

The post Entire UPS Fleet of Planes Grounded After Fatal Crash appeared first on The Western Journal.

Napster, the legendary peer-to-peer filesharing site that sparked a music pirating controversy in the early days of the internet before a recent evolution into an AI firm, has announced a stunning revelation to its shareholders. The $3.36 billion investment from a never-identified investor, which had been touted as a done deal in January, is never going to materialize.

The post Blast from the Past: Napster’s Promised $3 Billion Mystery Investor Vanishes appeared first on Breitbart.

Man suspected of explosions that destroyed pipelines between Russia and Germany more than three years ago has been placed in custody

The post Ukrainian Citizen Suspected of Nord Stream Gas Pipeline Explosions Held in Germany appeared first on Breitbart.

“Dilbert” creator Scott Adams posted two videos from the hospital on Wednesday to announce that he would not be recording his daily live stream of “Coffee with Scott Adams.” Adams, […]

The post Cancer-Stricken Trump Champion Scott Adams Goes Live from Hospital Room appeared first on The Western Journal.

Peace negotiations risk disruption as top negotiator raided by Ukrainian anti-corruption police, apparently over nuclear energy kickbacks.

The post Zelensky’s Chief of Staff Raided by Ukrainian Anti-Corruption Police, Imperilling Peace Talks appeared first on Breitbart.

Democratic Tennessee congressional candidate Aftyn Behn said in resurfaced audio that lawmakers openly praying during legislative sessions make her “uncomfortable.” While appearing on the “Red State Blue Moon” podcast in […]

The post Embattled Radical Democrat Candidate Said Prayer Makes Her 'Deeply Uncomfortable' in Resurfaced Audio appeared first on The Western Journal.

On this episode of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words,” Victor Davis Hanson and Sami Winc explore the Left’s troubling and growing acceptance of political violence. 

Editor’s note: This is a lightly edited transcript of today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words” from Daily Signal Senior Contributor Victor Davis Hanson. Subscribe to VDH’s own YouTube channel to watch past episodes.   

SAMI WINC: Victor, I just wanted to get your reflections on how we’ve had two assassination attempts on Donald Trump [less than] two years ago. And most recently, in this last year Charlie Kirk, of course, was assassinated. Is this something that is growing and going to be common or is this an aberration and going to die off in our culture?

VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: Well, the four most noticeable ones, that’s a pretty good pool to make a generalization. There was Tyler Robinson, who did kill Charlie Kirk. There was Luigi Mangione, who killed the United Healthcare executive. There was Ryan Routh, who tried to kill Trump. And there was Thomas Crooks, who hit Trump in the ear and killed another person and wounded two.

Is there a pattern? Yes. They’re all four people of the Left. They’re all four, not just people of the Left, but activists incited by particular left-wing dogmas. In the case of Tyler Robinson, he was into the trans movement, this weird, furry movement, and felt that Charlie Kirk was probably an obstacle to that. In the case of Crooks, he had gone from either isolated, crazy, conservative to hard Left, and he had bought into the idea that Donald Trump was an existential threat, and he hated him.  

If you look at Luigi Mangione, he was an overeducated nepo baby who believed that the health care [system] and the whole corporate world was unfair to poor people, and they weren’t getting health care. So, who’s going to take out one, the biggest, United Healthcare?

So he thought. That’s what he claimed.  

If you were Ryan Routh, he said so many crazy things, but he hated Trump because he thought he was going to cut off aid to Ukraine, everything.  

So now we have the idea that they are all trying to kill conservatives. By the way, there’s more of them than the opposite. If you count the eight or nine trans cases. Somebody just sent me something that was on the Libs of TikTok—I can’t assess the veracity of it. People who commit shootings of over four people based on their race or sexual orientation? The largest group shooting people were people who identified as trans or were in the trans movement of some way. I don’t know how you adjudicate all of those, whether you count Thomas Crook or you count Tyler Robinson who were somewhere there. Whether pronouns or furry animals or whatever crazy, kooky thing they are. But my point is this: That seems to be more common. And you go back to Stephen Scalise and other stuff.  

OK, why are they doing it now?

If you were an Old Testament person, you would say that they’re pretty convinced that nobody who shoots anybody goes to the death penalty, and very few get life in prison without parole. And there’s a good chance if you shoot somebody and you’re young enough, you’ll be out. Number one. 

Number two, the invective on social media—and that’s where they live, on social media—is all anti-Trump, anti-Trump, anti-corporate. It’s Left. There’s a huge left-wing. And the invective they’re using: Fascist, fascist, fascist, fascist, Nazi, Nazi, Nazi, Nazi, Hitler, Hitler, Hitler, Hitler.

In that environment, these people who are mentally ill or deranged or into some sex cult or into some left-wing bazaar are idolized. And they think if they shoot a conservative activist like Charlie Kirk or a health care executive, or Donald Trump, they’re going to be canonized, famous. They’re not going to be demonized. And the post-facto results show they’re absolutely correct. They’re making an opera out of Luigi Mangione in the Bay Area.

Tyler Robinson, people were already making fun of how Charlie Kirk died. They were reenacting, holding their neck. They had t-shirts with blood on their neck. They were crazy.  

As far as Trump, there were people almost immediately who said, “He missed.” They weren’t upset on the Left. So, to review. If the general jurisprudence is weaponized and in general, it’s therapeutic now and that people who shoot and kill … even Decarlos Brown that killed poor Iryna [Zarutska] on the North Carolina subway, I don’t think he’s going to get the death penalty. He’s been out so many times. And the guy who just tried to burn to death the girl on the [Chicago train].

So, the system sends a message to these four. You’re not going to really pay the ultimate price. And then it sends message number two that if you do do this, you’re going to be canonized as a political hero in some quarters. And number three, you’re going to be famous.

You add all of that up, and there’s a fourth. It’s going to be lax, the security, because these are not popular people. I don’t mean that conspiracy like some people are saying that Donald Trump was set up. I do believe that [under] the head of the Secret Service—Trump was not president—it was Joe Biden’s Secret Service, and she was fired—there was a general laxity that said, “That’s just Trump. Just go down to Pennsylvania and go through the motions, but don’t scour every building or if somebody comes in and he kind of lets off an alarm …” Yeah, that kind of attitude, which they didn’t have with Obama or Biden. And that was pretty much part of the idea. If you do it, there’s not going to be a lot of consequences, but you could get away with it.  

And if you’re at a university, and you’re walking around and Charlie Kirk is speaking and you just walk in broad daylight, you know, kind of limping around with an odd object or whatever you had to have, a gun, and then you go up on a roof, nobody says anything and you’re right. So laxity, laxity, laxity. Yeah, that explains it. Is it going to happen again? Absolutely.

WINC: Yeah. 

HANSON: Because if somebody gets shot tomorrow, if Donald Trump is assassinated tomorrow, two things will be much harder. He’s got a good Secret Service now, and he’s going to be much better protected. But if somebody gets close enough to try it, will that person to be canonized? Yes. Just look at those attacking the ICE people, trying to shoot ICE.

So, we have assassination chic right now.

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. 

The post Victor Davis Hanson: The Left’s ‘Assassination Chic’ and the Inevitability of Another Attack appeared first on The Daily Signal.