Former Louisville Cardinal and New York Jet Browning Nagle has died after a battle against colon cancer.

The post Ex-Louisville, Jets QB Browning Nagle Dies After Cancer Battle appeared first on Breitbart.

That’s the thing about the corporate media… There is no lie they will not invent and then gleefully spread if it damages Donald Trump. To them, the ends justify the means.

The post Nolte: Corporate Media Spread Hoax Trump Threatened the Pope appeared first on Breitbart.

Israeli national Ami Gaydarov, 22, has been charged with participating in an Iran-backed bomb plot to murder a high-ranking Israeli official - most likely former prime minister Naftali Bennett.

The post Israeli Man Charged with Aiding Iranian Plot to Kill Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett appeared first on Breitbart.

Several Hollywood celebrities, including Jodie Foster, Ben Stiller, Spike Lee, and Edward Norton have joined the list of those calling for the "immediate closure" of the Dilley Immigration Processing Center in Texas.

The post Ben Stiller, Jodie Foster, Spike Lee Among Hollywood Elites Demanding Shut Down of Texas ICE Facility appeared first on Breitbart.

CHARLOTTE, NC — Advertisements popped up all across the city this week for a local speakeasy, The Hush Room, modeled as a completely discreet and hidden Prohibition-era bar that no one knows about.

Vice President JD Vance heads to Islamabad, Pakistan, for negotiations with Iran amid the two-week ceasefire, marking a major moment for the 41-year-old vice president and the administration as a whole.

The post Vance Heads to Pakistan for Iran Negotiations at Pivotal Juncture in Ceasefire appeared first on Breitbart.

IWI US launches the ARAD 5, a piston-driven 5.56 rifle built for modern use, now produced from its new Tennessee facility.

The post IWI US Launches the ARAD 5 from Its New Tennessee Home appeared first on The Truth About Guns.

During the 2024 campaign, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to “end birthright citizenship” for children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents.

After winning by an electoral landslide, on Jan. 20, 2025, President Trump issued his executive order to fulfill that promise. The American Civil Liberties Union promptly filed a lawsuit challenging President Trump’s executive order.

That executive order was the subject of oral arguments in the Supreme Court on April 1, 2026. President Trump attended in person.

For reasons explained below, the court should sustain President Trump’s executive order because the people elected President Trump, and any ambiguities in the 14th Amendment should be construed in favor of the people—which is different than construing the amendment in favor of President Trump.

The purpose of President Trump’s executive order is clearly stated: “The privilege of United States citizenship is a priceless and profound gift. The Fourteenth Amendment states: ‘All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.’ That provision rightly repudiated the Supreme Court of the United States’s shameful decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), which misinterpreted the Constitution as permanently excluding people of African descent from eligibility for United States citizenship solely based on their race.”

President Trump’s executive order also acknowledged that, “The Fourteenth Amendment has always excluded from birthright citizenship persons who were born in the United States but not ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’”

On April 1, 2026, the lawyer representing the American Civil Liberties Union in its challenge to President Trump’s executive order relied primarily on the 1898 Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Wong Kim Ark for her arguments in favor of birthright citizenship for the children of parents not in the U.S. legally. She suggested that this “landmark decision” established that children born on U.S. soil are citizens regardless of their parents’ status.

As the parents of the child at issue in Wong Kim Ark were in the U.S. legally, to suggest that this “landmark decision” established birthright citizenship for the children of parents not legally allowed to reside in the United States defies logic.

The issue argued in the Supreme Court on April 1, 2026, centered around ambiguities in the phrase in the 14th Amendment, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

Even though the final Section of the 14th Amendment, Section 5, grants Congress “the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation,” the 14th Amendment, Congress has never enacted legislation clarifying the ambiguities in the phrase, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

When dealing with ambiguities in the 14th Amendment, unless or until Congress exercises its powers under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment to clarify ambiguities by legislative enforcement, the Supreme Court should construe the ambiguities in favor of the people, who re-elected President Trump.

Thirty years ago this month, the American Legislative Exchange Council published my article, “The Forgotten Preamble: Introduction to the Bill of Rights Gives More Meaning to the Tenth Amendment.” In it, I pointed out how the Preamble of the 1789 Bill of Rights explains the purpose of the Bill of Rights as “in order to prevent misconstructions or abuses of its power,” i.e., abuses of powers delegated by our Constitution to our federal government. In this light, I suggested:

Whenever federal courts and agencies are forced to “legislate” by construing legal ambiguities, they should utilize the final Article of the Bill of Rights – “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people” – as an interpretive rule to construe ambiguities against the proffering party, i.e., against Congress (See United States v. Heth, 1806.). … [A] Tenth Amendment rule of construction would provide a practical safeguard against federal encroachments on powers that neither the states nor the people have ever delegated to the national government.

Justice Neil Gorsuch explained in his June 28, 2024, concurring opinion in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which struck down decades of “Chevron deference” to unelected government bureaucrats: “Chevron deference sits in tension with many traditional legal presumptions and interpretive principles, representing nearly the inverse of … contra preferentem.”

President Trump repeatedly promised to “end birthright citizenship” for children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents, and then did just that on the first day of his second term. Now, the Supreme Court should resolve ambiguities in the 14th Amendment using contra preferentem and thereby avoid frustrating the will of the people.

It’s our government after all.

The post Principled Solution to Ambiguities about Birthright Citizenship appeared first on The Daily Signal.

President Donald Trump shared a graphic video Thursday night which showed the brutal murder of a Florida woman — a mother and a working American — using the footage to […]

The post LATE BREAKING: Trump Issues Shockingly Graphic Post Targeting Haitian Illegal Accused of Murdering Mother of 2 appeared first on The Western Journal.

Lara Trump said on her podcast The Right View with Lara Trump that people need to go out and buy Code Red: The Left, the Right, China, and the Race to Control AI, written by Breitbart News social media director Wynton Hall, as it lays out the the future of AI will be the "fight of our generation."

The post Lara Trump: ‘Code Red’ Is ‘Amazing,’ Future of AI Is ‘Fight of Our Generation’ appeared first on Breitbart.